Residence rules
The residence rules specific to universal credit are set out in the Welfare Reform Act 2012 and the Universal Credit Regulations 2013 (SI.No.376/2013).
NB: See below for equivalent legislation in Northern Ireland.
Basic condition for entitlement to universal credit |
Section 4 of the Welfare Reform Act 2012 |
Sets out the basic conditions for entitlement to universal credit including that the claimant is in Great Britain, and regulation making powers in relation to the circumstances in which a person is to be treated as in Great Britain, including the disregard of temporary absence. |
|---|---|---|
Person treated as not being in Great Britain |
Regulation 9 of SI.No.376/2013 as amended by regulation 8 of SI.No.683/2020. |
Provides that a person will not be treated as being in Great Britain unless they are habitually resident, that a person will not be treated as being habitually resident unless they have a right to reside (other than the categories of right to reside specified in paragraph 3 and 3A, that include being a jobseeker), and sets out the categories of right to reside that will lead to the claimant being treated as being in Great Britain. |
Crown servants and members of the armed forces who are posted overseas |
Regulation 10 of SI.No.376/2013 |
Excludes crown servants and members of the armed forces who are posted overseas from the requirement to be in Great Britain. |
Temporary absence from Great Britain |
Regulation 11 of SI.No.376/2013 |
Sets out the circumstances in which periods of absence are disregarded and the periods for which absence in each of the specified circumstances is disregarded. |
In Northern Ireland, the Welfare Reform (Northern Ireland) Order 2015 together with SR.No.216/2016 make provision relating to residence that is equivalent to that made in Great Britain.
Further explanation of the legislation is set out in guidance. Please note, however, guidance is not binding and cannot override the legislation.
Advice for decision making |
Sets out detailed guidance for decision makers on the presence condition and other residence issues. |
|
|---|---|---|
DWP guidance from parliament.uk |
Sets out guidance on temporary absences abroad, circumstances where the one month period can be extended, and holidays. |
|
DWP guidance from parliament.uk |
Provides definitions of ‘refugee’ and ‘asylum seeker’, sets out guidance on what support is given, and provides information on people arriving under a resettlement scheme, identifying a refugee, and method of payment. |
|
DWP guidance from parliament.uk |
Provides guidance on the habitual residence test, differences between legacy benefits and universal credit, and the genuine prospect of work test. |
|
DWP guidance from parliament.uk |
Provides guidance on the scheme to support locally employed staff who have worked for British Forces in Afghanistan. |
|
DWP guidance from parliament.uk |
Provides guidance on the Homes for Ukraine scheme and residence requirements for Ukrainians and their family members. |
|
DWP guidance from parliament.uk |
Provides guidance on how to provide evidence of settled status. |
Case law provides further interpretation of the legislation and establishes legal precedent.
AA v SSWP
|
Upper Tribunal
|
The Upper Tribunal finds that a First-tier Tribunal was correct to apply a two-month temporary absence disregard in the case of a universal credit claimant attending a funeral abroad who was caught by Covid-19 travel restrictions |
SSWP v MR
|
Upper Tribunal
|
The Upper Tribunal finds that a First-tier Tribunal failed to consider whether the claimant had a right to reside as a self-sufficient person throughout his period of residence |
KK v SSWP
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Upper Tribunal rejects ‘phasing’ of universal credit temporary absence disregards, and rules that absence for medical treatment must be ‘solely in connection with’ that treatment from the outset |
SSWP v SC
|
Upper Tribunal
|
The Upper Tribunal considers whether an award of universal credit can be superseded by a closed period supersession decision that operates for a future fixed period of time so that the award can resume once the claimant returns to Great Britain |
BZ, R (On the Application Of) v SSWP
|
High Court
|
Interpretation of Withdrawal Agreement provisions relating to rights of dependant family members who are not EU nationals and cease to be dependant by reason of domestic abuse |
GA v SSWP
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Refusal of universal credit unlawfully discriminated against claimant with pre-settled status who was unable to claim a ‘Destitution Domestic Violence Concession’ in 2022 |
SSWP v VB and another
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Claimant had right to reside on basis of having taken sufficient steps towards setting up business to be considered self-employed or, alternatively, on basis of ‘Brey’ analysis of self-sufficiency |
SSWP v PC (UC)
|
Upper Tribunal
|
EU national did not retain worker status for reasons including ‘undue delay’ of three months before making universal credit claim |
AM v SSWP (UC)
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Tribunal’s failure to apply the temporary absence from Great Britain disregard to a claimant caught by Covid-19 travel restrictions amounted to an error of law |
Simkova v SSWP
|
Court of Appeal
|
Court of Appeal rules that universal credit child element is not a social security family benefit for the purposes of Regulation (EC) 883/2004 |
SSWP v AT (AIRE Centre & IMA intervening)
|
Court of Appeal
|
Court of Appeal rules that DWP must carry out individualised assessments of whether refusal to award universal credit to claimants with pre-settled status would breach their right to live in dignity |
SS v Department for Communities (UC)
|
NI Commissioners
|
Whether a third country national granted entry clearance under the EU Family Permit route to join partner in Northern Ireland could establish a right to reside for universal credit purposes |
SSWP v WV
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Claimant can rely on social assistance benefits paid to a partner in order to demonstrate self-sufficiency where their presence did not increase entitlement |
SSWP v MS (UC)
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Universal credit child element is not a social security family benefit for the purposes of Regulation (EC) 883/2004 |
SSWP v AT (Aire Centre and IMA intervening)
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Before refusing universal credit on a right to reside ground to a claimant with pre-settled status, Secretary of State must be satisfied that refusal would not prevent them living in dignity |
FN v SSWP (UC)
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Guidance to representatives, tribunals and the DWP on the approach to obtaining information from an abusive partner to support a claim from the person fleeing abuse when a non-molestation injunction is in place - information needed in connection with a right to reside issue |
Fratila and another (AP) (Respondents) v SSWP (Appellant)
|
Supreme Court
|
Supreme Court unanimously allows DWP’s appeal against Court of Appeal ruling that government acted unlawfully in barring EU citizens from relying on pre-settled status to access universal credit |
Department for Communities in Northern Ireland
|
CJEU
|
CJEU rules that, while legislation excluding EU citizens with pre-settled status from universal credit is not contrary to EU law, competent authority must check that refusal of assistance does not infringe individual’s right to human dignity |
Fratila v SSWP
|
Court of Appeal
|
Court of Appeal rules that government acted unlawfully in barring EU citizens from relying on ‘pre-settled status’ to access universal credit |
Fratila & Anor, R (on the application of) v SSWP & Anor
|
High Court
|
High Court rules that precluding pre-settled status from conferring a right to reside is not unlawful discrimination |
SB v SSWP
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Where a person has become involuntarily unemployed after less than a year, self-employed status can be retained |
ODS v SSWP
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Effect of CJEU judgment in Lounes - dependent EEA family members of dual nationals can derive right to reside where dual national exercised Treaty rights prior to acquiring citizenship of host state. |
MW v SSWP
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Basic condition of being in Great Britain can be met with a right to reside that falls outside situations in regulation 9(4) of the Universal Credit Regulations 2013. |
SSWP v AC
|
Upper Tribunal
|
Analysis of proportionality is not relevant to refusal of right to reside for Greek claimant in the UK for 30 years. |
Simkova v SSWP
|
Supreme Court
|
Supreme Court rules universal credit child element is not a separate family benefit payable under EU coordination rules for a child living abroad |